On 7/2/2013 11:31 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> I think that would be better to merge the content into single
> 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. But I have no idea about the order of those
> two items. Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the
> change? :-)
Hi, thanks for pointing!
I think order o
2013/6/25 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hello,
>>
>> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
> Checked int www CVS.
>
> Thanks, K
Hi, Kirill,
By reviewing webpage of gcc-4.9 changes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html
I noticed there is a duplicate subsection 'IA-32/x86-64'
under "New Targets an
Hello,
>
> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
Checked int www CVS.
Thanks, K
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
> gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
Thanks,
Gerald
Ping?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
> gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
>
> OK to install?
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
>
Igor Zamyatin wrote:
+ GCC now supports new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
+ through -march=slm.
Not related to the release notes, but I think it should also be added to
gcc/doc/invoke.texi's "@item -march=@var{cpu-type}" - presumably after
the item:
@item atom
Intel At
Hi!
This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
OK to install?
Thanks,
Igor
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving re
