Ping?
Patch is attached for easy to apply.
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Zhenqiang Chen
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:57 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH, 1/10] two
On 09/22/2014 11:43 PM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>
> +@cindex @code{ccmp} instruction pattern
> +@item @samp{ccmp}
> +Conditional compare instruction. Operand 2 and 5 are RTLs which perform
> +two comparisons. Operand 1 is AND or IOR, which operates on the result of
> +operand 2 and 5.
> +It uses r
: [Ping] [PATCH, 1/10] two hooks for conditional compare (ccmp)
>
> On 09/22/2014 11:43 PM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> >
> > +@cindex @code{ccmp} instruction pattern @item @samp{ccmp}
> Conditional
> > +compare instruction. Operand 2 and 5 are RTLs which perform two
> &g
On 10/27/2014 12:47 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> + @var{NULL} if the combination of @var{prev} and this comparison is\n\
@code{NULL}
Otherwise ok.
r~
On 29 October 2014 10:28, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:56 PM
>> To: Zhenqiang Chen
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [Pin
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>
> Ping?
>
> Patch is attached for easy to apply.
Note I have been using an earlier version of this patch set in house and not
have found any issues with it.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Thanks!
> -Zhenqiang
>
>> -Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:56 PM
> To: Zhenqiang Chen
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Ping] [PATCH, 1/10] two hooks for conditional compare (ccmp)
>
> On 10/27/2014
On 10/29/2014 03:28 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> Thanks! Patch is updated.
Ok.
r~
