> Thanks for your comment.
> Please find attached the updated patch.
>
Ok - please apply .
Ramana
> --
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 23:12 +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On 17 November 2011 15:16, Sameera Deshpande
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Please find attached the patch updating NEG_POOL_RANGE from 1008 to
> > 1020 -(8 + ).
>
> This is OK - can you add a comment around the neg_pool_range attribute
On 17 November 2011 15:16, Sameera Deshpande wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please find attached the patch updating NEG_POOL_RANGE from 1008 to
> 1020 -(8 + ).
This is OK - can you add a comment around the neg_pool_range attribute
in arm.md stating that the limit should essentially be -
(8 + ?.
cheers
Raman
Hi!
Please find attached the patch updating NEG_POOL_RANGE from 1008 to
1020 -(8 + ).
Tested with check-gcc with no regression.
The test-case failing for patch 'STRD generation instead of PUSH in A15
ARM prologue' (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01158.html)
passes with this fix.
g
