Re: [RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-11 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 17:26 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:18:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 16:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:54:47AM -0600, Jeff Law via

Re: [RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-09 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 17:26 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:18:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 16:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:54:47AM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > > While technically OK the issue

Re: [RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:18:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 16:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:54:47AM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > While technically OK the issue is that it does not solve the x86 issue > > > > which with

Re: [RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-09 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 16:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:54:47AM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > While technically OK the issue is that it does not solve the x86 issue > > > which with incoming stack alignment < 8 bytes does not perform > > > dynamic

Re: [RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 08:54:47AM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > While technically OK the issue is that it does not solve the x86 issue > > which with incoming stack alignment < 8 bytes does not perform > > dynamic re-alignment to align 'long long' variables appropriately. > >

Re: [RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-09 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 09:17 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:13 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > > > We're seeing some failures due to the local-alignment pass. For example on > > sh4: > > > > Tests that now fail, but worked before (16 tests): > > > >

Re: [RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:13 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > We're seeing some failures due to the local-alignment pass. For example on > sh4: > > Tests that now fail, but worked before (16 tests): > > gcc.dg/pr48335-1.c (test for excess errors) > gcc.dg/pr48335-2.c (test for excess

[RFA] Fix various regressions and kernel build failure due to adjust-alignment issue

2020-06-08 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
We're seeing some failures due to the local-alignment pass. For example on sh4: Tests that now fail, but worked before (16 tests): gcc.dg/pr48335-1.c (test for excess errors) gcc.dg/pr48335-2.c (test for excess errors) gcc.dg/pr48335-5.c (test for excess errors) gcc.dg/pr48335-6.c (test for