Re: [RFA] fix copyright year range in libstdc++ test file (was: "Re: [v3 PATCH] Implement std::string_view and P0254r2, Integrating std::string_view and std::string.")

2019-01-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 01/01/19 09:45 +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: Hello, In working on updating the copyright year notices for the GDB files, I noticed something very minor regarding the patch which added the file below (the same file was copied in gdb's testsuite); it looks like the year range for one of the

Re: [RFA] fix copyright year range in libstdc++ test file (was: "Re: [v3 PATCH] Implement std::string_view and P0254r2, Integrating std::string_view and std::string.")

2019-01-01 Thread Joel Brobecker
> > In working on updating the copyright year notices for the GDB files, > > I noticed something very minor regarding the patch which added the > > file below (the same file was copied in gdb's testsuite); it looks > > like the year range for one of the files is truncated: > > >

Re: [RFA] fix copyright year range in libstdc++ test file (was: "Re: [v3 PATCH] Implement std::string_view and P0254r2, Integrating std::string_view and std::string.")

2019-01-01 Thread Mike Stump
On Dec 31, 2018, at 9:45 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > In working on updating the copyright year notices for the GDB files, > I noticed something very minor regarding the patch which added the > file below (the same file was copied in gdb's testsuite); it looks > like the year range for one of

[RFA] fix copyright year range in libstdc++ test file (was: "Re: [v3 PATCH] Implement std::string_view and P0254r2, Integrating std::string_view and std::string.")

2018-12-31 Thread Joel Brobecker
Hello, In working on updating the copyright year notices for the GDB files, I noticed something very minor regarding the patch which added the file below (the same file was copied in gdb's testsuite); it looks like the year range for one of the files is truncated: | diff --git