On 11/29/2015 09:24 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
I agree with the above. To add up on the above, we only require to calculate
the set of objects ( SSA_NAMES) that are live at the birth or the header of the
loop.
We don't need to calculate the live through the Loop considering Live in and
Hello Jeff:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:30 AM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal; GCC Patches
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [RFC, Patch]: Optimized changes in the register
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 11:44 AM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal; GCC Patches
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [RFC, Patch]: Optimized changes in the register used inside
Sorry I missed out some of the points in earlier mail which is given below.
-Original Message-
From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:07 PM
To: 'Jeff Law'; GCC Patches
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: RE: [RFC,
On 11/16/2015 10:36 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
For Induction variable optimization on tree SSA representation, the
register used logic is based on the number of phi nodes at the loop
header to represent the liveness at the loop. Current Logic used only
the number of phi nodes at the loop
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
>
> Sorry I missed out some of the points in earlier mail which is given below.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 11:07 PM
> To: 'Jeff Law'; GCC
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 10/07/2015 10:32 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 0001-RFC-Patch-Optimized-changes-in-the-register-used-ins.patch
>>>
>>>
>>> From
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/07/2015 10:32 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>
>>
>> 0001-RFC-Patch-Optimized-changes-in-the-register-used-ins.patch
>>
>>
>> From f164fd80953f3cffd96a492c8424c83290cd43cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ajit Kumar
On 10/07/2015 10:32 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
0001-RFC-Patch-Optimized-changes-in-the-register-used-ins.patch
From f164fd80953f3cffd96a492c8424c83290cd43cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 20:50:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC,
-Original Message-
From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 8:15 AM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida;
Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [RFC, Patch]: Optimized changes in the register used
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 10:29 AM
> To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
> Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta;
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
> Following Proposed:
>
> Changes are done in the Loop Invariant(LICM) at RTL level and also the
> Induction variable optimization based on SSA representation.
> The current logic used in LICM for register
Following Proposed:
Changes are done in the Loop Invariant(LICM) at RTL level and also the
Induction variable optimization based on SSA representation.
The current logic used in LICM for register used inside the loops is changed.
The Live Out of the loop latch node and the Live in of the
-Original Message-
From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 10:29 AM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida;
Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [RFC, Patch]: Optimized changes in the register used
14 matches
Mail list logo