On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On July 19, 2017 6:10:28 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Pinski
> wrote:
>>On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Andrew Pinski
>>wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Marc Glisse
>>wr
On July 19, 2017 6:10:28 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Andrew Pinski
>wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Marc Glisse
>wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Hi,
>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Unlike most other expressions, BIT_INSERT_EXPR has an implicit
>>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Unlike most other expressions, BIT_INSERT_EXPR has an implicit
>>> operand of the precision/size of the second operand. This me
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Unlike most other expressions, BIT_INSERT_EXPR has an implicit
>> operand of the precision/size of the second operand. This means if we
>> have an integer constant for the second operand a
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Hi,
Unlike most other expressions, BIT_INSERT_EXPR has an implicit
operand of the precision/size of the second operand. This means if we
have an integer constant for the second operand and that compares to
the same constant value, vn_nary_op_eq would r
Hi,
Unlike most other expressions, BIT_INSERT_EXPR has an implicit
operand of the precision/size of the second operand. This means if we
have an integer constant for the second operand and that compares to
the same constant value, vn_nary_op_eq would return that these two
expressions are the sam
