On 09/12/2017 01:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> >From a40c06fc06afcb7bb886d7a3106e6da631a48430 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: marxin
>> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:30:39 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] Reduce lookup_attribute memory footpr
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> >From a40c06fc06afcb7bb886d7a3106e6da631a48430 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: marxin
> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:30:39 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Reduce lookup_attribute memory footprint.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2017-09-12 Martin Li
On 09/12/2017 09:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> It's request for comment where I mechanically moved attribute-related
>> function to attribs.[hc].
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>>
>>
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> It's request for comment where I mechanically moved attribute-related
> function to attribs.[hc].
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Thoughts?
I've only noticed this now, what is the
On 08/08/2017 06:36 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I'm sending final version that I'm going to install. Compared to the previous
version I tested
all targets in contrib/config-list.mk.
I ran into a build breaker for an nvptx offloading compiler (where the
ACCEL_COMPILER-guarded code is enab
Hello.
I'm sending final version that I'm going to install. Compared to the previous
version I tested
all targets in contrib/config-list.mk.
Martin
>From 860a6af96c27be95ead1163e7512fdca4cc6a67a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:39:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Do refa
On 07/14/2017 09:23 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/13/2017 07:51 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> It's request for comment where I mechanically moved attribute-related
>> function to attribs.[hc].
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>>
>> Thoughts?
> S
On 07/14/2017 09:23 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/13/2017 07:51 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> It's request for comment where I mechanically moved attribute-related
>> function to attribs.[hc].
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>>
>> Thoughts?
> S
On 07/13/2017 07:51 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It's request for comment where I mechanically moved attribute-related
> function to attribs.[hc].
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Thoughts?
Seems reasonable. We don't like to move things ar
Hi.
It's request for comment where I mechanically moved attribute-related function
to attribs.[hc].
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Thoughts?
Martin
>From f4322151ebcd8cf71fd677317ef0a74374b0db5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Wed, 12 Jul
10 matches
Mail list logo