Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 20:24, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 1/5/21 10:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > > > > I fear I'm a bit lost here myself. I do have a little experience > > running various builders: > > > > * I inherited a Golang one on Solaris/amd64 (based on their own builder > > infrastructure).

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:25, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > On 1/5/21 10:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > >> > >> I fear I'm a bit lost here myself. I do have a little experience > >> running various builders: > >> > >> * I inherited a Golang one on Solaris/amd64 (based on their own builder >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Hi Jeff, > On 1/5/21 10:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: >> >> I fear I'm a bit lost here myself. I do have a little experience >> running various builders: >> >> * I inherited a Golang one on Solaris/amd64 (based on their own builder >> infrastructure). >> >> * I do run builders for GDB (mostly

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 1/5/21 10:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > > I fear I'm a bit lost here myself. I do have a little experience > running various builders: > > * I inherited a Golang one on Solaris/amd64 (based on their own builder > infrastructure). > > * I do run builders for GDB (mostly dormant since Sergio

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Hi Jeff, > On 1/5/21 10:09 AM, abebeos wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 18:50, Jeff Law > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1/5/21 2:18 AM, abebeos wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Jeff Law > >> >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 1/5/21 10:09 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 18:50, Jeff Law > wrote: > > > > On 1/5/21 2:18 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Jeff Law > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 18:50, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 1/5/21 2:18 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Jeff Law > > wrote: > > > > On 12/31/20 7:13 AM, abebeos wrote: > > [...] > > > > I'm definitely curious about the testing

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 1/5/21 2:18 AM, abebeos wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Jeff Law > wrote: > > On 12/31/20 7:13 AM, abebeos wrote: > [...] > >     >         I'm definitely curious about the testing setup and > >     whether or > >     >         not it can

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 21:40, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/31/20 7:13 AM, abebeos wrote: > [...] > > > I'm definitely curious about the testing setup and > > whether or > > > not it can > > > be replicated into our Jenkins setup. > > > > > > > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 12/31/20 7:13 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 05:41, Jeff Law > wrote: > > > > On 12/23/20 9:01 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:14, abebeos > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 05:41, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/23/20 9:01 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:14, abebeos > +abeb...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 12/23/20 9:01 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:14, abebeos +abeb...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law > wrote: > > > > On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:14, abebeos wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: >> > Essence: >> > >> > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: >> > >> > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu >>

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 23:20, abebeos wrote: > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > [...] > I'd ask the original author, but it seems he's busy with other work, so to >> > avoid delays... >> >> Please try to ask him first? That

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 22:44, abebeos wrote: [...] > And look at this: > > * 200h (estimation) for the patch > Not my work, other author(s).

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

+cc: Law, Biener, On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 20:27, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > On понеделник, 14 декември 2020 г. 20:53:36 EET Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > On петък, 11 декември 2020 г. 19:00:35 EET abebeos wrote: > > > After "digesting" a bit more your review, I need to thank you for > opening > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On понеделник, 14 декември 2020 г. 20:53:36 EET Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > On петък, 11 декември 2020 г. 19:00:35 EET abebeos wrote: > > After "digesting" a bit more your review, I need to thank you for opening > > my eyes re "cherrypick" suggestion and... the missing g++ summaries. I > > need > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 04:01, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/14/20 12:10 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > On четвъртък, 10 декември 2020 г. 10:24:50 EET Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:42 AM Dimitar Dimitrov > wrote: > >>> On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 12/14/20 12:10 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > On четвъртък, 10 декември 2020 г. 10:24:50 EET Richard Biener wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:42 AM Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: >>> On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: Essence: I need a

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On четвъртък, 10 декември 2020 г. 10:24:50 EET Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:42 AM Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > Essence: > > > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On петък, 11 декември 2020 г. 19:00:35 EET abebeos wrote: > After "digesting" a bit more your review, I need to thank you for opening > my eyes re "cherrypick" suggestion and... the missing g++ summaries. I need > to update my setup to provide the g++ test-deltas, too. Note that in my >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 15:57, abebeos wrote: > > > Στις Πέμ, 10 Δεκ 2020 στις 7:42 π.μ., ο/η Dimitar Dimitrov < > dimi...@dinux.eu> έγραψε: > >> On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: >> > Essence: >> > >> > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law wrote: I'm definitely curious about the testing setup and whether or not it can be replicated into our Jenkins setup. Hi, Jeff. The gcc testsuite setup is described in the readme of avrtest:

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > > > works fine. > > > > The problem with the avr target is

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 09:49:25AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/12/20 11:33 AM, abebeos wrote: > > Here it is: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561718.html > > > > > > My understanding is that

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 12/12/20 11:33 AM, abebeos wrote: > > > On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 01:15, Segher Boessenkool > mailto:seg...@kernel.crashing.org>> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:20:01PM +0200, abebeos wrote: > > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 01:15, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:20:01PM +0200, abebeos wrote: > > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > > > > Ok, to speed things up, is it ok if I simply pick the patch that

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Hi! On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:17:19PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> I'd ask the original author, but it seems he's busy with other work, so to > >> avoid delays... > > > > Please try to ask him first? That is always nice, but you all also need > > to figure out what to do with

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Hello! >> I'd ask the original author, but it seems he's busy with other work, so to >> avoid delays... > > Please try to ask him first? That is always nice, but you all also need > to figure out what to do with the bounty. Going through the messages in this thread, my suggestion would be to

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:20:01PM +0200, abebeos wrote: > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > > > Ok, to speed things up, is it ok if I simply pick the patch that I've > > > attached to the issue: > > > > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 11:00 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:16:44PM +0200, abebeos wrote: > > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 10:02 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > > > > My understanding of

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:16:44PM +0200, abebeos wrote: > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 10:02 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < > seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > > > My understanding of "non-FSF world-legals" is that something that is > > > already released/assigned needs no submission. > > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 10:02 μ.μ., ο/η Segher Boessenkool < seg...@kernel.crashing.org> έγραψε: > Hi! > > Thanks for trying to push this forward. > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:49:18PM +0200, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 8:32 μ.μ., ο/η Jeff Law > έγραψε: > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Hi! Thanks for trying to push this forward. On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:49:18PM +0200, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 8:32 μ.μ., ο/η Jeff Law έγραψε: > > On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > saaadhu (1st choice, zero regressions) should have one, has

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Παρ, 11 Δεκ 2020 στις 8:32 μ.μ., ο/η Jeff Law έγραψε: > > > On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > > > works fine. > > > > The problem with the avr

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On 12/9/20 6:12 AM, abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > Essence: > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > works fine. > > The problem with the avr target is that the testsuite cannot be run easily, > mainly because of the need

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Πέμ, 10 Δεκ 2020 στις 7:42 π.μ., ο/η Dimitar Dimitrov έγραψε: > On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > > > works fine. > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Στις Πέμ, 10 Δεκ 2020 στις 7:42 π.μ., ο/η Dimitar Dimitrov έγραψε: > On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > > > works fine. > > >

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:42 AM Dimitar Dimitrov wrote: > > On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Essence: > > > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > > > works fine. > > > > The

Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

On сряда, 9 декември 2020 г. 15:12:49 EET abebeos via Gcc-patches wrote: > Essence: > > I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: > > https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu > > works fine. > > The problem with the avr target is that the testsuite cannot be run easily, >

[RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)

Essence: I need a confirmation that the testsuite setup as presented in: https://github.com/abebeos/avr-gnu works fine. The problem with the avr target is that the testsuite cannot be run easily, mainly because of the need for a special simulated-target setup, which does not work for avr as