Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Jun 2, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>> Introduce -finline-stringops
>
> Ping? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620472.html
Should the docs for the x86-specific -minline-all-stringops refer to
the new -finline-stringops?
On Jun 2, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Introduce -finline-stringops
Ping? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620472.html
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 3:11 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> > Would it make more sense to extend it, even constrained by the
> > limitations mentioned above, or handle memset only? In the latter case,
> > would it still make sense to
On Jan 19, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Would it make more sense to extend it, even constrained by the
> limitations mentioned above, or handle memset only? In the latter case,
> would it still make sense to adopt a command-line option that suggests a
> broader effect than it already has,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:25 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 2:55 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> Target-specific code is great for tight optimizations, but the main
> >> purpose of this feature is not an optimization. AFAICT
On Jan 16, 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 2:55 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Target-specific code is great for tight optimizations, but the main
>> purpose of this feature is not an optimization. AFAICT it actually
>> slows things down in general (due to code growth, and
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 2:55 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Hello, Richard,
>
> Thank you for the feedback.
>
> On Jan 12, 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:12 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
>
> >> This patch extends the memset expansion to start with a
Hello, Paul,
On Jan 13, 2023, Paul Koning wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 2023, at 8:54 PM, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>> Target-specific code is great for tight optimizations, but the main
>> purpose of this feature is not an optimization. AFAICT it actually
>> slows things down in
> On Jan 13, 2023, at 8:54 PM, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> Hello, Richard,
>
> Thank you for the feedback.
>
> On Jan 12, 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:12 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>
>>> This patch extends the memset
Hello, Richard,
Thank you for the feedback.
On Jan 12, 2023, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:12 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>> This patch extends the memset expansion to start with a loop, so as to
>> still take advantage of known alignment even with long
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 5:12 AM Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> try_store_by_multiple_pieces was added not long ago, enabling
> variable-sized memset to be expanded inline when the worst-case
> in-range constant length would, using conditional blocks with powers
> of two to cover all
try_store_by_multiple_pieces was added not long ago, enabling
variable-sized memset to be expanded inline when the worst-case
in-range constant length would, using conditional blocks with powers
of two to cover all possibilities of length and alignment.
This patch extends the memset expansion
12 matches
Mail list logo
