Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-10-25 Thread Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
As we discussed in the last RISC-V GNU sync up, I've committed this patch-set to trunk after rebase and running regression with latest binutils. On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:23 AM Kito Cheng wrote: > > Hi Vineet: > > I am not familiar with buildroot, so I am not sure which GCC version will > work,

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-10-17 Thread Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
Hi Vineet: I am not familiar with buildroot, so I am not sure which GCC version will work, but I think the patch set should be able to apply both gcc 11.1 and trunk without conflict. Here is a gcc 11.1 + this patch set on my github, hope this could help :) https://github.com/kito-cheng/riscv-gcc/

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-10-13 Thread Vineet Gupta
Hi Kito, On 9/23/21 12:57 AM, Kito Cheng wrote: Bit manipulation extension[1] is finishing the public review and waiting for the rest of the ratification process, I believe that will become a ratified extension soon, so I think it's time to submit to upstream for review now :) As the title incl

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-09-28 Thread Jim Wilson
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:05 PM Christoph Muellner < cmuell...@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > We talked about this in the T&R meeting on Monday. > Philipp Tomsich mentioned, that he has a patchset from earlier this > year, which adds support for Zbs. > He proposed to rebase it and send it to the list

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-09-28 Thread Christoph Muellner
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:01 AM Jim Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:57 AM Kito Cheng wrote: >> >> Bit manipulation extension[1] is finishing the public review and waiting for >> the rest of the ratification process, I believe that will become a ratified >> extension soon, so I think

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-09-28 Thread Jim Wilson
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:20 AM Christoph Muellner < cmuell...@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > In case somebody wants to test this patchset, a patchset for Binutils > is required as well. > AFAIK here would be the Binutils branch with the required changes: > > https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-binu

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-09-28 Thread Jim Wilson
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:57 AM Kito Cheng wrote: > Bit manipulation extension[1] is finishing the public review and waiting > for > the rest of the ratification process, I believe that will become a ratified > extension soon, so I think it's time to submit to upstream for review now > :) > We

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-09-27 Thread Christoph Muellner
In case somebody wants to test this patchset, a patchset for Binutils is required as well. AFAIK here would be the Binutils branch with the required changes: https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-binutils-gdb/tree/riscv-binutils-experiment On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 9:57 AM Kito Cheng wrote: > > Bit

[RFC PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Bit-manipulation extension.

2021-09-23 Thread Kito Cheng
Bit manipulation extension[1] is finishing the public review and waiting for the rest of the ratification process, I believe that will become a ratified extension soon, so I think it's time to submit to upstream for review now :) As the title included RFC, it's not a rush to merge to trunk yet, I