On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 03:11, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 12:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >
>
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 12:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 12:18, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 30 Sep
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:28, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Wed, 25 Sep
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, 25 Sep
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >>>
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 01:08, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >>>
> On Fri, 20 Sep
On 10/1/19 12:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> >
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 23:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place
On 9/30/19 12:49 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> On 9/26/19 12:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>>
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 9/26/19 12:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> For PR91532, the dead store
On 9/26/19 12:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
between
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
> > > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:20, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
> > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there
> > ?
> > Or should we add an ad-hoc
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 10:30, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
> > between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there
> > ?
> > Or should we add
On 9/19/19 10:19 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
> between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ?
> Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that
> will clean up the
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
> between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ?
> Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that
> will clean up the
Hi,
For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ?
Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that
will clean up the dead store ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
20 matches
Mail list logo