On 12/03/15 12:07:35, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> > OK. As I mentioned in a previous reply, originally we prefixed
> > all "UPC" specific tree node fields and functions with UPC_ or upc_,
> > but as we transitioned away from UPC as a separate language
> > (ala Ob
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> On 12/01/15 12:26:32, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> > > -struct GTY(()) tree_type_common {
> > > +struct GTY((user)) tree_type_common {
> > >struct tree_common common;
> > >tree size;
> > >tree size_unit;
> >
On 12/01/15 12:26:32, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> > -struct GTY(()) tree_type_common {
> > +struct GTY((user)) tree_type_common {
> >struct tree_common common;
> >tree size;
> >tree size_unit;
> > @@ -1441,10 +1458,10 @@ struct GTY(()) tree_type_comm
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> Background
> --
>
> An overview email, describing the UPC-related changes is here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg5.html
>
> The GUPC branch is described here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gupc.html
>
> The UPC-relate
Background
--
An overview email, describing the UPC-related changes is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg5.html
The GUPC branch is described here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gupc.html
The UPC-related source code differences are summarized here:
http://gccupc
