Background
--
An overview email, describing the UPC-related changes is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg5.html
The GUPC branch is described here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gupc.html
The UPC-related source code differences are summarized here:
http://gccupc
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> Background
> --
>
> An overview email, describing the UPC-related changes is here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg5.html
>
> The GUPC branch is described here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gupc.html
>
> The UPC
> I think this also shows that using a POINTER_TYPE for a non-pointer
> is bogus. POINTER_TYPE is not for "semantically a pointer" but
> for pointers. Just use RECORD_TYPE here (and of course lower
> things earlier).
FWIW that's what Ada does for its fat pointers.
--
Eric Botcazou
