Hi,
Is this patch ready for GCC14?
Thanks.
Qing
Begin forwarded message:
From: Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>>
Subject: Fwd: [V6][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field
including flexible array member [PR101832]
Date: April 11, 2023 at 9
Thanks a lot for the testing, Kees.
Jakub, do you have any more comment on the 6th version of the patches?
Is it ready for the GCC13 commit? Or we need to delay it to GCC14?
This patch has been there waiting for approving for a while, I think that it’s
a nice improvement to GCC and also help to
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 03:49:43PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> the C front-end has been approved by Joseph.
>
> Jacub, could you please eview the middle end part of the changes of this
> patch?
>
> The major change is in tree-object-size.cc (addr_object_size).
> (To use the new
@gcc.gnu.org>>
Subject: Fwd: [V6][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field
including flexible array member [PR101832]
Date: April 4, 2023 at 9:06:37 AM EDT
To: Jakub Jelinek mailto:ja...@redhat.com>>
Cc: Joseph Myers mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com>>
Ping…
Qing
Begin forwarded message:
From: Qing Zhao mailto:qing.z...@oracle.com>>
Subject: [V6][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field
including flexible array member [PR101832]
Date: March 28, 2023 at 11:49:43 AM EDT
To: ja...@redhat.com<mailto:ja...@redhat.c
the C front-end has been approved by Joseph.
Jacub, could you please eview the middle end part of the changes of this patch?
The major change is in tree-object-size.cc (addr_object_size).
(To use the new TYPE_INCLUDE_FLEXARRAY info).
This patch is to fix
