Re: [build] Remove LIB2ADDEHDEP

2011-06-07 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Rainer Orth wrote: * The gcc/unwind* files and gcc/emutls.c can move, too. And the other files listed in LIB2ADDEH for various targets, I expect. arm/libunwind.S arm/pr-support.c arm/unwind-arm.c arm/unwind-arm.h ia64/fde-vms.c ia64/unwind-ia64.c ia64/unwind-ia64.h

Re: [build] Remove LIB2ADDEHDEP

2011-06-07 Thread Rainer Orth
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes: On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Rainer Orth wrote: * The gcc/unwind* files and gcc/emutls.c can move, too. And the other files listed in LIB2ADDEH for various targets, I expect. arm/libunwind.S arm/pr-support.c arm/unwind-arm.c arm/unwind-arm.h

Re: [build] Remove LIB2ADDEHDEP

2011-06-07 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Rainer Orth wrote: Right, my plan was to move all files only referenced by LIB2ADDEH*. Does the plan seem ok otherwise? Yes, it seems plausible. Thanks for working on this transition. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

[build] Remove LIB2ADDEHDEP

2011-06-03 Thread Rainer Orth
When checking in the Solaris toplevel libgcc patch on wednesday, I notice that I still had LIB2ADDEH and LIB2ADDEHDEP in gcc/config/t-sol2. The latter is completely unused now that libgcc does automatic dependency generation and I had already removed it in libgcc/config/t-sol2. This patch

Re: [build] Remove LIB2ADDEHDEP

2011-06-03 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 06/03/2011 05:11 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: Bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc-solaris2.11, ok for mainline? I suppose this is obvious. The patch is okay, I'll look at the rest next week. Paolo