Re: [committed] Cherry-pick upstream asan fix for upcoming glibc (PR sanitizer/71160)

2016-05-18 Thread Florian Weimer
On 05/17/2016 04:46 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:38:27PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: Hi Jakub, thanks for backporting this! Do you have any plans to apply this patch to GCC 5 and 6 branches? AFAIK people hit on this ASan + newer Glibc bug by using GCC 5.3.1 on Fedora 23

Re: [committed] Cherry-pick upstream asan fix for upcoming glibc (PR sanitizer/71160)

2016-05-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:38:27PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > thanks for backporting this! Do you have any plans to apply this patch to > GCC 5 and 6 branches? AFAIK people hit on this ASan + newer Glibc bug by > using GCC 5.3.1 on Fedora 23. I don't have the newer glibc on my

Re: [committed] Cherry-pick upstream asan fix for upcoming glibc (PR sanitizer/71160)

2016-05-17 Thread Maxim Ostapenko
Hi Jakub, thanks for backporting this! Do you have any plans to apply this patch to GCC 5 and 6 branches? AFAIK people hit on this ASan + newer Glibc bug by using GCC 5.3.1 on Fedora 23. On 17/05/16 12:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Hi! This is a cherry-pick of upstream fix, so that dlsym can cal

[committed] Cherry-pick upstream asan fix for upcoming glibc (PR sanitizer/71160)

2016-05-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! This is a cherry-pick of upstream fix, so that dlsym can call not just calloc, but also malloc or realloc, even before asan is initialized. Tested on x86_64-linux, committed so far to trunk. IMHO even better would be to make sure that in the common case (recent glibc) we don't have failed dl