Hi!
We ICE with C++11 attributes, because their TREE_PURPOSE is not
IDENTIFIER_NODE, but TREE_LIST.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
committed to trunk and 6.2 as obvious.
2016-07-04 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR c++/71739
* tree.c (attribute_value_equal): Use get_attribute_name instead of
directly using TREE_PURPOSE.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr71739.C: New test.
--- gcc/tree.c.jj 2016-06-24 12:59:22.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/tree.c 2016-07-04 11:17:48.425814493 +0200
@@ -5009,7 +5009,7 @@ attribute_value_equal (const_tree attr1,
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (attr2)) == TREE_LIST)
{
/* Handle attribute format. */
- if (is_attribute_p ("format", TREE_PURPOSE (attr1)))
+ if (is_attribute_p ("format", get_attribute_name (attr1)))
{
attr1 = TREE_VALUE (attr1);
attr2 = TREE_VALUE (attr2);
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr71739.C.jj 2016-07-04 11:19:16.629676012
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr71739.C 2016-07-04 11:18:56.000000000
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// PR c++/71739
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <int N> struct alignas(N) A;
+template <int N> struct alignas(N) A {};
Jakub
