[committed] Re: Bug in DEC UNION/STRUCT patch

2016-08-23 Thread Fritz Reese
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > Fritz, > > I was lookng at part of a previous patch that I committed for you. > In interface.c, one now has > > static int > compare_components (gfc_component *cmp1, gfc_component *cmp2, > gfc_symbol *derived1, gfc_symbol *derived2) > { >

Re: [committed] Re: Bug in DEC UNION/STRUCT patch

2016-08-23 Thread Dominique d'Humières
> This above is pretty clearly a typo. The attached patch committed as > obvious r239706. Could you please provide a test failing before r239706 and succeeding after it? TIA Dominique

Re: [committed] Re: Bug in DEC UNION/STRUCT patch

2016-08-23 Thread Fritz Reese
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Dominique d'Humières wrote: >> This above is pretty clearly a typo. The attached patch committed as >> obvious r239706. > Could you please provide a test failing before r239706 and succeeding after > it? > I will work on that - it seems to be harder to exhibit t

Re: [committed] Re: Bug in DEC UNION/STRUCT patch

2016-08-23 Thread Dominique d'Humières
I think pr77327 is also yours!-( Dominique > Le 23 août 2016 à 21:46, Fritz Reese a écrit : > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Dominique d'Humières > wrote: >>> This above is pretty clearly a typo. The attached patch committed as >>> obvious r239706. >> Could you please provide a test faili