On Fri, 2 Sep 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> To catch these cases with a diagnostic earlier is
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wold-style-declaration enough to diagnose all cases
> that the new standard will reject?
I think so.
> I suppose -W*-c2x-compat are not the correct vehicle to
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 11:18 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/1/2022 1:12 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > C2x has completely removed unprototyped functions, so that () now
> > means the same as (void) in both function declarations and
> > definitions, where previously that change had
On 9/1/2022 1:12 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
C2x has completely removed unprototyped functions, so that () now
means the same as (void) in both function declarations and
definitions, where previously that change had been made for
definitions only. Implement this accordingly.
This is a change
C2x has completely removed unprototyped functions, so that () now
means the same as (void) in both function declarations and
definitions, where previously that change had been made for
definitions only. Implement this accordingly.
This is a change where GNU/Linux distribution builders might wish
