Re: [committed] libgcc CRIS: Define TARGET_HAS_NO_HW_DIVIDE

2023-04-26 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches
> From: Paul Koning > Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:02:31 -0400 > > On Apr 26, 2023, at 8:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > > Not many targets define this besides msp430, pdp1, xtensa, > > and arm compared to those that appear to unconditionally > > have a hardware division instruction (also,

Re: [committed] libgcc CRIS: Define TARGET_HAS_NO_HW_DIVIDE

2023-04-26 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc-patches
> On Apr 26, 2023, at 8:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Not many targets define this besides msp430, pdp1, xtensa, > and arm compared to those that appear to unconditionally > have a hardware division instruction (also, pdp11 and > msp430 seem confused and should be empty instead of "1"

[committed] libgcc CRIS: Define TARGET_HAS_NO_HW_DIVIDE

2023-04-26 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches
Not many targets define this besides msp430, pdp1, xtensa, and arm compared to those that appear to unconditionally have a hardware division instruction (also, pdp11 and msp430 seem confused and should be empty instead of "1" and "(! TARGET_HWMULT)" - and having hardware multiplication doesn't