This fixes a bug caused by a mismatch between the macros defined by
when GCC is built and the macros defined by when
users include . If the user code is compiled with
_XOPEN_SOURCE defined to 500 or 600, Darwin suppresses the
ENOTRECOVERABLE and EOWNERDEAD macros, which are not defined by SUSv3
(
> Oops, and I also forgot to update the other headers that were using
> those autoconf-generated macros!
>
> Fixed by this patch. Tested on mingw-w64, pushed to trunk.
The original patch was apparently backported onto the gcc-10 branch, but not
this follow-up fix, so Windows builds are now broke
On 01/04/21 16:04 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Oops, and I also forgot to update the other headers that were using
those autoconf-generated macros!
Fixed by this patch. Tested on mingw-w64, pushed to trunk.
The original patch was apparently backported onto the gcc-10 branch, but not
this follow
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 01/04/21 16:04 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > Oops, and I also forgot to update the other headers that were using
> > > those autoconf-generated macros!
> > >
> > > Fixed by this patch. Tested on mingw-w64, pu
On 01/04/21 16:27 +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 01/04/21 16:04 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Oops, and I also forgot to update the other headers that were using
> > those autoconf-generated macros!
> Thanks, pushed.
I can confirm that the build failure we had is now gone, thanks!
> Eric, are you building the RC with --enable-maintainer-mode maybe? Or
> regenerating the autoconf files yourself?
The latter, we have local configure changes so we regenerate the script.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 01/04/21 18:47 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Thanks, pushed.
I can confirm that the build failure we had is now gone, thanks!
Eric, are you building the RC with --enable-maintainer-mode maybe? Or
regenerating the autoconf files yourself?
The latter, we have local configure changes so we re
On 16/12/20 13:38 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fixes a bug caused by a mismatch between the macros defined by
when GCC is built and the macros defined by when
users include . If the user code is compiled with
_XOPEN_SOURCE defined to 500 or 600, Darwin suppresses the
ENOTRECOVERABLE and E
On 17/12/20 14:05 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/12/20 13:38 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fixes a bug caused by a mismatch between the macros defined by
when GCC is built and the macros defined by when
users include . If the user code is compiled with
_XOPEN_SOURCE defined to 500 or
