Hi!
When adding OMP_MASKED, I apparently forgot to handle it in
potential_constant_expression_1, which means we can ICE on it.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
committed to trunk.
2021-11-22 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR c++/103349
* constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Punt on OMP_MASKED.
* g++.dg/gomp/masked-1.C: New test.
--- gcc/cp/constexpr.c.jj 2021-11-18 12:33:22.014628184 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/constexpr.c 2021-11-21 20:56:15.138499377 +0100
@@ -8686,6 +8686,7 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t,
case OMP_SINGLE:
case OMP_SECTION:
case OMP_MASTER:
+ case OMP_MASKED:
case OMP_TASKGROUP:
case OMP_TARGET_UPDATE:
case OMP_TARGET_ENTER_DATA:
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/masked-1.C.jj 2021-11-21 21:01:19.610215568
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/masked-1.C 2021-11-21 21:00:44.914703723
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// PR c++/103349
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+int v;
+
+void
+foo (int x, int y)
+{
+ [=] ()
+ {
+#pragma omp masked
+ v = x + y;
+ } ();
+}
Jakub
