Re: [committed] testsuite: Add -Wno-psabi to vshuf-mem.C test

2024-06-17 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 6/14/24 20:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Also wonder about the // { dg-additional-options "-march=z14" { target s390*-*-* } } line, doesn't that mean the test will FAIL on all pre-z14 HW? Shouldn't it use some z14_runtime or similar effective target, or check in main (in that case copied over to

Re: [committed] testsuite: Add -Wno-psabi to vshuf-mem.C test

2024-06-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:09:37PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > On 6/14/24 20:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Also wonder about the > > // { dg-additional-options "-march=z14" { target s390*-*-* } } > > line, doesn't that mean the test will FAIL on all pre-z14 HW? > > Shouldn't it use some

[committed] testsuite: Add -Wno-psabi to vshuf-mem.C test

2024-06-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:06:31AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > The current implementation assumes to always be invoked with register > operands. For memory operands we even have an instruction > though (vlrep). With the patch we try this first and only if it fails > force the input into a