../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1: ambiguous attribute 'n'; could be '1'
(via 'I124MODE:n') or '4' (via 'I48MODE:n')
../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1: ambiguous attribute 'n'; could be '1'
(via 'I124MODE:n') or '' (via 'I48MODE:n')
../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1: ambiguous attribute 'n'; could be '2'
(via 'I124MODE:n') or '4' (via 'I48MODE:n')
../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1: ambiguous attribute 'n'; could be '2'
(via 'I124MODE:n') or '' (via 'I48MODE:n')
../../gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md:4109:1: ambiguous attribute 'n'; could be '4'
(via 'I124MODE:n') or '' (via 'I48MODE:n')
The insn name already uses <I124MODE:n> explicitly, just the preparation
stmts don't, and as it creates a I124MODE lowpart subreg of a word mode
register, <I124MODE:n> seems obviously correct.
Committed as obvious.
2020-05-02 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* config/tilegx/tilegx.md
(insn_stnt<I124MODE:n>_add<I48MODE:bitsuffix>): Use <I124MODE:n>
rather than just <n>.
--- gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md.jj 2020-01-12 11:54:36.431413137 +0100
+++ gcc/config/tilegx/tilegx.md 2020-05-02 12:04:14.092322428 +0200
@@ -4110,7 +4110,7 @@ (define_expand "insn_stnt<I124MODE:n>_ad
operands[1] = simplify_gen_subreg (<I124MODE:MODE>mode, operands[1],
DImode,
BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN
- ? UNITS_PER_WORD - <n> : 0);
+ ? UNITS_PER_WORD - <I124MODE:n> : 0);
})
(define_insn "*insn_stnt<I124MODE:n>_add<I48MODE:bitsuffix>"
Jakub
