Re: [gofrontend-dev] [PATCH 7/9] Gccgo port to s390[x] -- part I

2014-10-28 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:30:08AM -0700, Ian Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > The attached patch contains all the discussed changes. > I made a few formatting changes. I patched the test to work on x86, > by making the char types accept either int8 or uint

Re: [gofrontend-dev] [PATCH 7/9] Gccgo port to s390[x] -- part I

2014-10-28 Thread Ian Taylor
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > The attached patch contains all the discussed changes. I made a few formatting changes. I patched the test to work on x86, by making the char types accept either int8 or uint8, and making the long double tests accept any floating point siz

Re: [gofrontend-dev] [PATCH 7/9] Gccgo port to s390[x] -- part I

2014-10-28 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:45:03PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > +case 8: > > + return (is_unsigned) ? "uint8" : "int8"; > > No need to parenthesize is_unsigned here and in the following lines. That's just my way of coding. I a

Re: [gofrontend-dev] [PATCH 7/9] Gccgo port to s390[x] -- part I

2014-10-16 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > This patch extends the -fdump-go-spec option to handle bitfields > and unions and fixes handlinx of zero length arrays. All of this > is necessary for s390[x] since the system headers use these > features. Please check the commit comment for