Hi,

this patch revert a independent clause in oacc kernels region related test-case.

Committed to gomp-4_0-branch.

Thanks,
- Tom
Revert "Add c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-nest-independent.c"

2015-10-2  Tom de Vries  <t...@codesourcery.com>

	Revert:
	2015-07-15  Tom de Vries  <t...@codesourcery.com>

	* c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-nest-independent.c: New test.
---
 .../goacc/kernels-loop-nest-independent.c          | 40 ----------------------
 1 file changed, 40 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-nest-independent.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-nest-independent.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-nest-independent.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 1996865..0000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-loop-nest-independent.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-/* { dg-additional-options "-O2" } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-ftree-parallelize-loops=32" } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-parloops_oacc_kernels-all" } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-optimized" } */
-
-/* Based on autopar/outer-1.c.  */
-
-#include <stdlib.h>
-
-#define N 1000
-
-int
-main (void)
-{
-  int x[N][N];
-
-#pragma acc kernels copyout (x)
-  {
-#pragma acc loop independent
-    for (int ii = 0; ii < N; ii++)
-      for (int jj = 0; jj < N; jj++)
-	x[ii][jj] = ii + jj + 3;
-  }
-
-  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
-    for (int j = 0; j < N; j++)
-      if (x[i][j] != i + j + 3)
-	abort ();
-
-  return 0;
-}
-
-/* Check that only one loop is analyzed, and that it can be parallelized.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SUCCESS: may be parallelized, marked independent" 1 "parloops_oacc_kernels" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "FAILED:" "parloops_oacc_kernels" } } */
-
-/* Check that the loop has been split off into a function.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "(?n);; Function .*main._omp_fn.0" 1 "optimized" } } */
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "(?n)oacc function \\(32," 1 "parloops_oacc_kernels" } } */
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to