Hi Jakub!
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> [...] "omp declare target link" [...]
> This patch only marks them with the new attribute, [...]
> --- gcc/c/c-parser.c.jj 2015-07-16 18:09:25.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/c/c-parser.c 2015-07-17
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:31:24PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Jakub!
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > [...] "omp declare target link" [...]
>
> > This patch only marks them with the new attribute, [...]
>
> > --- gcc/c/c-parser.c.jj
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:54:17PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Here is the patch.
> make check RUNTESTFLAGS=gomp.exp and check-target-libgomp passed.
> OK for gomp-4_5-branch?
>
>
> gcc/c/
> * c-parser.c: Include context.h.
> (c_parser_omp_declare_target): If decl has "omp declare
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 20:12:25 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 08:44:07PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 00:11:03 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > As the testcases show, #pragma omp
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 08:44:07PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 00:11:03 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > As the testcases show, #pragma omp declare target has now a new form
> > > (well,
> > > two; with some
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 00:11:03 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > As the testcases show, #pragma omp declare target has now a new form (well,
> > two; with some issues on it pending), where it is used just as a single
> > declarative
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> As the testcases show, #pragma omp declare target has now a new form (well,
> two; with some issues on it pending), where it is used just as a single
> declarative directive rather than a pair of them and allows marking
> vars and
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:35:52PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > As the testcases show, #pragma omp declare target has now a new form (well,
> > two; with some issues on it pending), where it is used just as a single
> > declarative
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:39:04PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > Without declare target link or to, you can't use the global variables
> > in orphaned accelerated routines (unless you e.g. take the address of the
> > mapped variable in the region and pass it around).
> > The to variables
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 20:05:39 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 09:35:52PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > As the testcases show, #pragma omp declare target has now a new form
> > > (well,
> > > two; with some
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 15:05:59 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> As the testcases show, #pragma omp declare target has now a new form (well,
> two; with some issues on it pending), where it is used just as a single
> declarative directive rather than a pair of them and allows marking
> vars and
Hi!
As the testcases show, #pragma omp declare target has now a new form (well,
two; with some issues on it pending), where it is used just as a single
declarative directive rather than a pair of them and allows marking
vars and functions by name as omp declare target vars/functions (which the
Jakub,
On 07/17/2015 08:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
...
I believe OpenACC has something similar, but no idea if it is already
implemented.
Yes, it is implemented in gomp-4_0-branch.
While the purpose for 'omp declare target' and 'acc declare' are
similar, the data movement, via the
13 matches
Mail list logo