Committed to google 4_6 branch.
Thanks,
-Sri.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> ok for google branches.
>
> David
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:05 PM, wrote:
>> I have uploaded a new patch set with all the mentioned changes made. If
>> a function has the target attri
ok for google branches.
David
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:05 PM, wrote:
> I have uploaded a new patch set with all the mentioned changes made. If
> a function has the target attribute it will not be touched by the
> autoclone pass.
>
> Also fixed some test cases which were broken because the clon
I have uploaded a new patch set with all the mentioned changes made. If
a function has the target attribute it will not be touched by the
autoclone pass.
Also fixed some test cases which were broken because the clone names
used '_' instead of '.' for suffixing.
On 2011/12/16 19:39:47, davidxl wr
http://codereview.appspot.com/5490054/diff/1011/config/i386/i386.c
File config/i386/i386.c (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5490054/diff/1011/config/i386/i386.c#newcode26569
config/i386/i386.c:26569: +mversion_for_core2 (tree *optimization_node,
-> mversionable_for_core2_p ?
http://codere