On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:44, wrote:
>> could
>> 2149 be optimized away. */
>> 2150 if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (DECL_ORIGIN (fdecl))) == METHOD_TYPE
>> 2151 && gimple_call_num_args(call) > 0)
>
>> Wouldn't it be easier to make fdecl == DECL_ORIGIN (fdecl) earlier in
>
> the
>>
>>
http://codereview.appspot.com/4591066/diff/3001/gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c
File gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4591066/diff/3001/gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c#newcode1159
gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c:1159: gcc_assert (false);
On 2011/06/11 17:52:51, Dieg
OK with some minor nits.
Diego.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4591066/diff/3001/gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c
File gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4591066/diff/3001/gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c#newcode1159
gcc/tree-threadsafe-analyze.c:1159: gcc_assert (
Just identified a bug in my previous patch after running the compiler on
google code base. Basically the difference from the previous patch is for the
compiler to handle the case where the parameters of a cloned method are
optimized away.
Bootstrapped OK. Testing is still on-going. OK for google/m
Enhance Annotalysis to support cloned functions/methods (especially created
by IPA-SRA). The patch basically does the following:
1. For a FUNCTION_DECL, check whether it's a clone, and if so, grab its
original DECL.
2. Deal with the situation where a reference/pointer parameter is converted
to a v
