ok for google branches -- LTO specific bugs should be isolated and
submitted upstream.
David
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/5001/value-prof.c
File value-prof.c (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/5001/value-prof.c#newcode1720
value-prof.c:1720: direct_call2 = 0;
Ok
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:22 PM, wrote:
>
> will send the new patch set in a few minutes.
>
>
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h
> File cgraph.h (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h#newcode410
> cgraph.h:410:
> They are referenced in lto-cgraph.c
will send the new patch set in a few minutes.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h
File cgraph.h (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h#newcode410
cgraph.h:410:
They are referenced in lto-cgraph.c etc.
On 2012/06/07 21:46:53, davidxl wrote:
Why not put
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h
File cgraph.h (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h#newcode410
cgraph.h:410:
Why not putting this into value-prof.h?
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/ipa-split.c
File ipa-split.c (right):
http://coderevi