subject:"\[i386\] adjust flag_omit_frame_pointer in a single function \[PR113719\] \(was\: Re\: \[PATCH\] \[i386\] restore recompute to override opts after change \[PR113719\]\)"

Re: [i386] adjust flag_omit_frame_pointer in a single function [PR113719] (was: Re: [PATCH] [i386] restore recompute to override opts after change [PR113719])

2024-07-14 Thread Hongtao Liu

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 9:07 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2024, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > On Jul 3, 2024, Rainer Orth wrote: > > > Hmm, I wonder if leaf frame pointer has to do with that. > > It did, in a way. > > > > The first two patches for PR113719 have each regressed >

[i386] adjust flag_omit_frame_pointer in a single function [PR113719] (was: Re: [PATCH] [i386] restore recompute to override opts after change [PR113719])

2024-07-11 Thread Alexandre Oliva

On Jul 4, 2024, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jul 3, 2024, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hmm, I wonder if leaf frame pointer has to do with that. It did, in a way. The first two patches for PR113719 have each regressed gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c on a different target. The reason for this instabi