Re: [libgcc] Protect __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

2016-11-20 Thread Marc Glisse
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02220.html I think this is obvious. Ok, I've committed it. -- Marc Glisse

Re: [libgcc] Protect __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

2016-11-04 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: > Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02220.html I think this is obvious. Thanks, Andrew > > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Marc Glisse wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> some optimization patch I was working on simplified

Re: [libgcc] Protect __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

2016-11-04 Thread Marc Glisse
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02220.html On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Marc Glisse wrote: Hello, some optimization patch I was working on simplified __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0 to false, which is not wanted (I assume that's why it wasn't written __TMC_END__ == __TMC_LIST__

[libgcc] Protect __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0

2016-10-27 Thread Marc Glisse
Hello, some optimization patch I was working on simplified __TMC_END__ - __TMC_LIST__ == 0 to false, which is not wanted (I assume that's why it wasn't written __TMC_END__ == __TMC_LIST__ in the first place). Bootstrap+regtest on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. 2016-10-27 Marc Glisse