On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> >> These assert should tell you what is wrong with the control flow.
>>> >> Please look at control_flow_insn_p, which condition returns true.
>>> >
>>> > There is a note after call insn.
>>> >
>>> > (call_insn:TI 908 35558 50534 1681 (call (m
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:29:18PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
>> wrote:
>> >> These assert should tell you what is wrong with the control flow.
>> >> Please look at control_flow_insn_p, whi
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:29:18PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
> >> These assert should tell you what is wrong with the control flow.
> >> Please look at control_flow_insn_p, which condition returns true.
> >
> > There is a note after cal
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
>> These assert should tell you what is wrong with the control flow.
>> Please look at control_flow_insn_p, which condition returns true.
>
> There is a note after call insn.
>
> (call_insn:TI 908 35558 50534 1681 (call (mem:QI (symbol_ref:D
> These assert should tell you what is wrong with the control flow.
> Please look at control_flow_insn_p, which condition returns true.
There is a note after call insn.
(call_insn:TI 908 35558 50534 1681 (call (mem:QI (symbol_ref:DI
("_gfortran_stop_string") [flags 0x41] ) [0 _gfortran_stop_strin
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vladimir Yakovlev
Date: 2012/11/9
Subject: Re: [off-list] Re: [PATCH] Vzeroupper placement/47440
To: Uros Bizjak
Копия: "H.J. Lu" , Igor Zamyatin
I did changes that moves vzeroupper insertion after reload
2012-11-09 Vladimi
