On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de wrote:
Hi,
OK for trunk?
I will be on holiday starting tomorrow, so I would like to commit
this today, if possible (with a mistake in the ChangeLog noted
by Uros fixed. Thanks!)
If not, somebody please commit this (or
Hi,
OK for trunk?
I will be on holiday starting tomorrow, so I would like to commit
this today, if possible (with a mistake in the ChangeLog noted
by Uros fixed. Thanks!)
If not, somebody please commit this (or another fix).
Thomas
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
On 07/29/2012 11:24 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
here is an updated patch for PR 54033, this time with test cases.
Thanks to Janis for pointing me in the right direction with these.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Ok.
On 08/02/2012 10:54 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Seems to break testing, all testcases emit
Warning: Nonexistent include directory finclude^M
now and thus all testcases fail like
FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_basics_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
First, I actually wonder why it only
Hi Tobias,
I am not sure whether it is the best solution, but one possibility would
be to ignore -fintrinsic-modules-path for the warning. (That assumes
that the warning is (almost) never needed for an installed compiler.)
I think this is the right approach. The attached patch does this.
On 07/29/2012 11:24 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
here is an updated patch for PR 54033, this time with test cases.
Thanks to Janis for pointing me in the right direction with these.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Ok. Thanks for the patch - and to Janis for the first review.
Can you eliminate
Hello world,
here is an updated patch for PR 54033, this time with test cases.
Thanks to Janis for pointing me in the right direction with these.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Thomas
2012-07-29 Thomas König tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/54033
* scanner.c