Hi Jerry,
The patch is OK, but I’m a bit puzzled about what the testcase does.
It tests that we can OPEN a directory, but not READ from it? I didn’t know that
was expected (to be able to OPEN a directory), and I find it somewhat puzzling.
Can you shed light on that?
Thanks,
FX
On 08/28/2015 10:18 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
I found that in read_buf where raw_read is called, no checks for errors were
being made, raw_read returns the number of bytes read or an error code. In
the
test case, an error occurs and we proceeded to use the resulting error code as
if it were
On 08/28/2015 11:59 PM, FX wrote:
Hi Jerry,
The patch is OK, but I’m a bit puzzled about what the testcase does.
It tests that we can OPEN a directory, but not READ from it? I didn’t know
that was expected (to be able to OPEN a directory), and I find it somewhat
puzzling. Can you shed
I found that in read_buf where raw_read is called, no checks for errors were
being made, raw_read returns the number of bytes read or an error code. In the
test case, an error occurs and we proceeded to use the resulting error code as
if it were the number of bytes read.
The attached patch
