On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> 2014-08-15 21:32 GMT+04:00 enh :
>> can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this? use
>> b.android.com (and feel free to mail me to ensure that they get
>> noticed).
>
> Sure, I will do that.
>
>> one thing we'd like to do is get
2014-08-15 21:32 GMT+04:00 enh :
> can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this? use
> b.android.com (and feel free to mail me to ensure that they get
> noticed).
Sure, I will do that.
> one thing we'd like to do is get to a point where we're building
> gcc/gdb et cetera without any local
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2014, at 10:32 AM, enh wrote:
>> can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this?
>
> I suspect you meant to ask Alexander this question… but just in case you did
> intend to ask me, no. I don’t have any visibility into andr
On Aug 15, 2014, at 10:32 AM, enh wrote:
> can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this?
I suspect you meant to ask Alexander this question… but just in case you did
intend to ask me, no. I don’t have any visibility into android local patches
or procedures.
In the end, people with lo
can you file bugs against bionic for stuff like this? use
b.android.com (and feel free to mail me to ensure that they get
noticed).
one thing we'd like to do is get to a point where we're building
gcc/gdb et cetera without any local hacks, and when we've got to that
point, we're going to have to g
On Aug 15, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> * lib/target-supports.exp (error_h): New check.
> (libc_has_complex_functions): Ditto.
> (tgmath_h): Ditto.
> * gcc.dg/builtins-59.c: Add libc_has_complex_functions check.
> * gcc.dg/builtins-61.c: Likewise.
>
Hi Joseph,
I seem to address what you've said.
Except for I still left non_bionic check for three tests
(Namely: builtins-67.c, strlenopt-14g.c, strlenopt-14gf.c)
because checks for the presence of mempcpy, stpcpy and rintl (sorry, I
didn't mention it last time)
seem to be very narrow, I don't t
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch disables a bunch of tests that fail when using Bionic libc.
> But this is expected; three reasons:
> - Bionic does not support complex functions.
> - Bionic does not have tgmath.h and error.h headers.
> - Bionic does not have mem
Hi,
This patch disables a bunch of tests that fail when using Bionic libc.
But this is expected; three reasons:
- Bionic does not support complex functions.
- Bionic does not have tgmath.h and error.h headers.
- Bionic does not have mempcpy and stpcpy.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/
