2014-03-13 21:41 GMT+04:00 Georg-Johann Lay :
> Am 03/13/2014 04:41 PM, schrieb Senthil Kumar Selvaraj:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Problem is that the assembler name might or might not be prefixed by '*'
>>> depending on when TARGET_SET_CURREN
Am 03/13/2014 04:41 PM, schrieb Senthil Kumar Selvaraj:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Problem is that the assembler name might or might not be prefixed by '*'
depending on when TARGET_SET_CURRENT_FUNCTION is called.
The change is just to fix wrong warning be
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 02:24:06PM +0100, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> Problem is that the assembler name might or might not be prefixed by '*'
> depending on when TARGET_SET_CURRENT_FUNCTION is called.
>
> The change is just to fix wrong warning because the current implementation
> of TARGET_SET_
This is again a request for approval to fix PR59396.
Problem is that the assembler name might or might not be prefixed by '*'
depending on when TARGET_SET_CURRENT_FUNCTION is called.
The change is just to fix wrong warning because the current implementation of
TARGET_SET_CURRENT_FUNCTION /alw
