On 12-10-03 6:53 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Hello,
This patch uses the libiberty new-like operators instead of using
xmalloc/xrealloc.
It also adds timevars for the main LRA phases, and it fixes a warning
suggesting a space before a ';' in
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch uses the libiberty new-like operators instead of using
> xmalloc/xrealloc.
> It also adds timevars for the main LRA phases, and it fixes a warning
> suggesting a space before a ';' in an only-looping for loop.
>
> Boots
On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:05 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> This patch uses the libiberty new-like operators instead of using
> xmalloc/xrealloc.
So, in headers that can be used by C compiles, we should use the abstraction…
Should we prefer it for translation units that are C++ only?
Hello,
This patch uses the libiberty new-like operators instead of using
xmalloc/xrealloc.
It also adds timevars for the main LRA phases, and it fixes a warning
suggesting a space before a ';' in an only-looping for loop.
Bootstrapped (lra-branch, of course) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK?
Ciao