> On Jul 26, 2021, at 11:09 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> So you either need to change build_access_from_expr like I described in
>>> my email
>>
>> Is the following the change you suggested previously:
>>
>> [opc@qinzhao-ol8u3-x86 gcc]$ git diff tree-sra.c
>> diff --git
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> HI, Martin,
>
> Thank you for the comments and suggestions on tree-sra.c changes.
>
>>> **Compare with the 4th version, the following are the major changes:
>>>
>>> 1. delete the code for handling "grp_to_be_debug_replaced" since they are
>>> not
Martin,
The following is the patch to fix the issues you raised in the previous email,
let me know if I still miss anything:
Thanks a lot.
Qing
=
From 14524a228b4b41b4eaaa2497455725e075126c2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qing Zhao
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 15:46:59 +
Subject:
HI, Martin,
Thank you for the comments and suggestions on tree-sra.c changes.
>> **Compare with the 4th version, the following are the major changes:
>>
>> 1. delete the code for handling "grp_to_be_debug_replaced" since they are
>> not needed per Martin Jambor's suggestion.
>
> sorry if
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 25 2021, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the 5th version of the patch for the new security feature for GCC.
>
> I have tested it with bootstrap on both x86 and aarch64, regression testing
> on both x86 and aarch64.
> Also compile and run CPU2017, without any
> On Jul 25, 2021, at 10:59 AM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is the 5th version of the patch for the new security feature for GCC.
>
> I have tested it with bootstrap on both x86 and aarch64, regression testing
> on both x86 and aarch64.
> Also compile and run
