Re: [patch] Back-port ifcvt.c changes from PR54146

2012-10-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hello, > > This patch is a back-port of one of the scalability improvements I > made to perform, well, maybe not well but at least not so poorly on > the test case of PR54146, which has an extremely large function. > > The problem in ifcvt

[patch] Back-port ifcvt.c changes from PR54146

2012-10-14 Thread Steven Bosscher
Hello, This patch is a back-port of one of the scalability improvements I made to perform, well, maybe not well but at least not so poorly on the test case of PR54146, which has an extremely large function. The problem in ifcvt.c has two parts. The first is that clearing several arrays of size(ma