On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:30 AM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > OK though I wonder if you could get away with using
> > built_function_type (void_type_node, NULL_TREE); aka
> > a non-prototype void f().
>
> See below.
>
> > Did you track down what changed the requirement?
>
> The new function-abi.cc
> OK though I wonder if you could get away with using
> built_function_type (void_type_node, NULL_TREE); aka
> a non-prototype void f().
See below.
> Did you track down what changed the requirement?
The new function-abi.cc module, so I'd rather have a correct prototype.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:17 AM Eric Botcazou via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a regression present on mainline, 11 and 10 branches: on bare-metal
> platforms, the Ada compiler emulates stack checking (it is required by the
> language and tested by ACATS) in the runtime via the
Hi,
this is a regression present on mainline, 11 and 10 branches: on bare-metal
platforms, the Ada compiler emulates stack checking (it is required by the
language and tested by ACATS) in the runtime via the stack_check_libfunc hook
of the RTL middle-end. Calls to the function are generated
