> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:19 PM Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is a regression present on the mainline and 10 branch for architectures
> > that pass all structure types by reference, e.g. 32-bit PowerPC or SPARC.
> >
> > Jakub posted a detailed analysis in the audit trail and this
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:18 AM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > The whole point of thunks is that they do not require things like copying
> > ... is this case somehow IPA-SRA/CPed in an odd way? Otherwise it seems
> > like the passed through reference was mishandled on the GIMPLE level?
>
> Maybe,
> The whole point of thunks is that they do not require things like copying
> ... is this case somehow IPA-SRA/CPed in an odd way? Otherwise it seems
> like the passed through reference was mishandled on the GIMPLE level?
Maybe, but the change looks correct on its own and nobody has cared about
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:19 PM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a regression present on the mainline and 10 branch for architectures
> that pass all structure types by reference, e.g. 32-bit PowerPC or SPARC.
>
> Jakub posted a detailed analysis in the audit trail and this boils down to
>
Hi,
this is a regression present on the mainline and 10 branch for architectures
that pass all structure types by reference, e.g. 32-bit PowerPC or SPARC.
Jakub posted a detailed analysis in the audit trail and this boils down to
the RTL expander trying to take the address of a DECL whose RTX is
