On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Due to the different interfaces of int_size_in_bytes and
simple_type_size_in_bits (and 'size' in add_byte_size_attribute being
unsigned and not [unsigned] HWI) it would be cleaner to
add an early return after the call
Hi,
this is an old bug report from Jan, which was closed, then reopened by Tom at
some point, but the patch never got reviewed. The original submission is at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg01857.html
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2013-11-11 Jan
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
this is an old bug report from Jan, which was closed, then reopened by Tom at
some point, but the patch never got reviewed. The original submission is at:
Due to the different interfaces of int_size_in_bytes and
simple_type_size_in_bits (and 'size' in add_byte_size_attribute being
unsigned and not [unsigned] HWI) it would be cleaner to
add an early return after the call to int_size_in_bytes if its
return value is -1 (and make sure the return
