> I think you need to add an effective-target check, because the new test
> fails on aarch64/arm:
Done.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 13:33, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:49 AM Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this replaces the ICE by a sorry message for the use of reverse scalar
> > storage
> > order with a 128-bit decimal floating-point type on 32-bit platfo
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:49 AM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this replaces the ICE by a sorry message for the use of reverse scalar storage
> order with a 128-bit decimal floating-point type on 32-bit platforms.
>
> Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
OK.
Richard.
>
> 2020-12-03 E
Hi,
this replaces the ICE by a sorry message for the use of reverse scalar storage
order with a 128-bit decimal floating-point type on 32-bit platforms.
Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
2020-12-03 Eric Botcazou
* expmed.c (flip_storage_order): In the case of a non-integ
