Re: [patch] Fix libfortran/101255, wrong IOSTAT value for FLUSH

Patch committed, after changing “call abort” to “stop”. Thanks for the review. FX

Re: [patch] Fix libfortran/101255, wrong IOSTAT value for FLUSH

Hi FX, we now use "STOP n" instead of "call abort" in testcases. OK with this change. Am 16.12.21 um 17:34 schrieb FX via Fortran: With correct patch attached, sorry. Hi, Bug reported by Tobias at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101255

Re: [patch] Fix libfortran/101255, wrong IOSTAT value for FLUSH

With correct patch attached, sorry. Hi, Bug reported by Tobias at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101255 Trivial fix, adding a testcase. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK to commit? FX

Re: [patch] Fix libfortran/101255, wrong IOSTAT value for FLUSH

Hi FX, Am 16.12.21 um 15:49 schrieb FX via Fortran: Hi, Bug reported by Tobias at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101255 Trivial fix, adding a testcase. it seems you attached the wrong patch (the one for pr985079). Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK to

[patch] Fix libfortran/101255, wrong IOSTAT value for FLUSH

Hi, Bug reported by Tobias at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101255 Trivial fix, adding a testcase. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK to commit? FX pr98507.patch Description: Binary data