On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>
> The following source:
>
> template static void f();
> void g() { f(); }
>
> results in "_Z1fIiEvv" under g++, but in "_ZL1fIiEvv" under clang.
>
> Richard Smith says:
>
> The ABI doesn't cover manglings for local symbols ...
> ...
Ian?
Ping x4.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>> Original message:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00394.html
>>
>>
> I'm adding Ian in CC.
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
Hi,
On 09/18/2013 09:23 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
Ping x3?
2013/9/11 Paul Pluzhnikov :
Ping x2?
Original message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00394.html
I'm adding Ian in CC.
Paolo.
Ping x3?
2013/9/11 Paul Pluzhnikov :
> Ping x2?
>
> Original message:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00394.html
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
Ping x2?
Original message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00394.html
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> Ping?
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
Ping?
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> The following source:
>
> template static void f();
> void g() { f(); }
>
> results in "_Z1fIiEvv" under g++, but in "_ZL1fIiEvv" under clang.
>
> Richard Smith says:
>
> The ABI doesn't cover manglings for local symbols ...
>
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I think this should also be send to the GCC List as libiberty is
> officially maintained by GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00394.html
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
Greetings,
I've been redirected here from binutils:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2013-08/msg00052.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2013-08/msg00056.html
The following source:
template static void f();
void g() { f(); }
results in "_Z1fIiEvv" under g++, but in "_ZL1fIiEvv" under c
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jan Kratochvil
> wrote:
>
>> there should be a new case in:
>> libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected
>
> Thanks. I updated the patch.
> --
> Paul Pluzhnikov
I think this should also be send to the
