On 11/1/12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> This patch normalizes more bitmap function names.
>>
>>sbitmap.h
>>
>> TEST_BIT -> bitmap_bit_p
>> SET_BIT -> bitmap_set_bit
>
> I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became
> bitmap
On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote:
This patch normalizes more bitmap function names.
sbitmap.h
TEST_BIT -> bitmap_bit_p
SET_BIT -> bitmap_set_bit
I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became
bitmap_test_bit() ? I never particularly liked the lispy *