Re: [patch] Normalize more bitmap function names.

2012-11-01 Thread Lawrence Crowl
On 11/1/12, Diego Novillo wrote: > On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> This patch normalizes more bitmap function names. >> >>sbitmap.h >> >> TEST_BIT -> bitmap_bit_p >> SET_BIT -> bitmap_set_bit > > I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became > bitmap

Re: [patch] Normalize more bitmap function names.

2012-11-01 Thread Diego Novillo
On 2012-10-31 13:41 , Lawrence Crowl wrote: This patch normalizes more bitmap function names. sbitmap.h TEST_BIT -> bitmap_bit_p SET_BIT -> bitmap_set_bit I wonder if it wouldn't it be more consistent if TEST_BIT became bitmap_test_bit() ? I never particularly liked the lispy *