01
From: Aldy Hernandez
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:44:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] PR tree-optimization/96818 - cast label range to type of
switch operand
PR tree-optimization/96818
* tree-vrp.c (find_case_label_range): Cast label range to
type of switch operand.
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/p
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> As discussed in the PR, the type of a switch operand may be different
> than the type of the individual cases. This is causing us to attempt to
> intersect incompatible ranges.
>
> This inconsistent IL seems wrong to me, but it also seems
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:33:20AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> In any case type mismatches here are of course unfortunate
> and both more verification and documentation would be
> nice. verify_gimple_switch only verifies all case labels
> have the same type, the type of the switch argument is
>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:33:20AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > In any case type mismatches here are of course unfortunate
> > and both more verification and documentation would be
> > nice. verify_gimple_switch only verifies all case
On 8/31/20 10:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As discussed in the PR, the type of a switch operand may be different
than the type of the individual cases. This is causing us to attempt to
intersect incompatible ranges.
This inconsistent
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:10 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/31/20 10:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >> As discussed in the PR, the type of a switch operand may be different
> >> than the type of the individual cases. This is
On 8/31/20 5:10 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 8/31/20 10:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As discussed in the PR, the type of a switch operand may be different
than the type of the individual cases. This is causing us to attempt to
intersect
On 8/31/20 2:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:10 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 8/31/20 10:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
As discussed in the PR, the type of a switch operand may be different
than the type of the
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:21 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/31/20 2:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:10 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/31/20 10:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> >
On 9/3/20 3:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:21 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 8/31/20 2:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:10 AM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 8/31/20 10:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20 AM Aldy Hernandez wrot
On September 3, 2020 5:39:18 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
>On 9/3/20 3:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:21 AM Aldy Hernandez
>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/31/20 2:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:10 AM Aldy Hernandez
>wrote:
>
>
template
class GTY((user)) int_range : public irange
{
so people can use
int_range x;
and get the max range by default?
Indeed, I had forgotten about default template arguments, the only
problem is
int_range x;
is valid in c++17, but previous to that we have to do
int_range<> x;
Its a bit
12 matches
Mail list logo
