On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:39:22AM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
On 2 October 2011 10:30, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 September 2011 17:30, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 September 2011 08:54, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 September 2011 17:30, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
On 19 September 2011 08:54, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
Bootstrapped on powerpc64-suse-linux, tested on powerpc64-suse-linux
and arm-linux-gnueabi
OK for mainline?
Sorry I missed this patch.
On 19 September 2011 08:54, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
Bootstrapped on powerpc64-suse-linux, tested on powerpc64-suse-linux
and arm-linux-gnueabi
OK for mainline?
Sorry I missed this patch. Is there any reason why we need unspecs in
this case ? Can't this be represented by subregs
On 26 September 2011 17:12, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds a support of widening shift left. The following
pattern is detected:
type a_t;
TYPE a_T, res_T;
a_t = ;
a_T = (TYPE)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
On 26 September 2011 17:12, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds a support of widening shift left. The following
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds a support of widening shift left. The following
pattern is detected:
type a_t;
TYPE a_T, res_T;
a_t = ;
a_T = (TYPE) a_t;
res_T = a_T CONST;
('TYPE' is at least 2 times bigger than 'type', and
